The influence for the Vision Pro’s design.
It’s hard not to see the uncanny resemblance between these two products. 📓
Storing things inside Your AirPods Pro 2 case.
I ended up getting a mini workout done when I was not really expecting to at my son’s wrestling practice. Normally I just use the time to do some writing, but now I have to split the time between writing and working out due to less free time at home with the new baby.
The Milanese band is my band of choice for jogging, but I forgot to swap it out and was wearing my link bracelet. I wear the link bracelet a bit loose since it’s uncomfortable when tight, but I needed to tighten it up for the workout.
I ended up taking out one link, and storing it in my AirPods Pro 2 case. It fits pretty good inside there, and even attaches magnetically making it harder for the link to fall out. I do use the smaller sized bracelet labelled 38mm (also the same as 40mm, 41mm, and the new 42mm), but I’m confident there is enough space for the larger links to also fit.
I’m not a fan of working out with the link bracelet, but it’s doable, especially if you have storage for your extra links. 📓
I ended up getting a mini workout done when I was not really expecting to at my son’s wrestling practice. Normally I just use the time to do some writing, but now I have to split the time between writing and working out due to less free time at home with the new baby.
The Milanese band is my band of choice for jogging, but I forgot to swap it out and was wearing my link bracelet. I wear the link bracelet a bit loose since it’s uncomfortable when tight, but I needed to tighten it up for the workout.
I ended up taking out one link, and storing it in my AirPods Pro 2 case. It fits pretty good inside there, and even attaches magnetically making it harder for the link to fall out. I do use the smaller sized bracelet labelled 38mm (also the same as 40mm, 41mm, and the new 42mm), but I’m confident there is enough space for the larger links to also fit.
I’m not a fan of working out with the link bracelet, but it’s doable, especially if you have storage for your extra links.
The iPhone 16E will be Apple’s new “buffered” iPhone.
Tim Cook on Twitter:
Get ready to meet the newest member of the family.
Wednesday, February 19. #AppleLaunch
I’ve been thinking about this (probably too much,) but I don’t think it will be a new iPhone SE.
As a matter of fact, I think the SE lineup will be killed off.
What we will probably get is a new variant of the iPhone 16, rumored to be the iPhone 16E. This makes perfect sense for several reasons.
The iPhone SE lineup has defining features that make it an SE, the biggest two being the classic top and bottom bezels and the Home Button. If you get rid of both of those, you might as well get rid of the name too since it won’t make sense. People have associated the SE branding with those two hallmark features.
I know what you’re thinking. Apple has transformed many other devices and kept the same name, but in this case, pricing is a huge factor.
The 16E will have to support Apple Intelligence since Apple is heavily pushing it, meaning it will have an A17 Pro or A18 chip. Putting a faster chip in an iPhone SE model that beats the iPhone 15 in performance, and pricing it lower than that is nonsensical. If this device is part of the 16 lineup as the 16E, it becomes easy to make the price higher than the SE, but lower than the regular 16. I think it will take the place of the iPhone 15 and start at $699.
So now you have the following price points:
iPhone 16 Pro Max - $1,199 (starts at 256GB)
iPhone 16 Pro - $999
iPhone 16 Plus - $899
iPhone 16 - $799
iPhone 16E - $699
iPhone 15 Plus - $699
iPhone 15 - $599
The iPhone 14 and SE will be discontinued like in the EU, and the starting iPhone price takes a huge jump up from $429 to $599. I don’t think that’s a real shocker even though the click-bait headlines will definitely scream, “Apple raises lowest iPhone price by 40%.”
Seriously though, who really is buying the iPhone SE these days? I’m sure most people are being upsold into the iPhone 14 which is leagues better than the SE, making the real starting price of an iPhone as of today, $599.
Tim’s headline, “newest member of the family,” sounds like a whole new branding, and I think the “E” lineup of iPhones will fall in-line with the “A” line of Pixel phones.
The “E” lineup of iPhones also doesn’t have to be refreshed every year. It will be like the SE, acting like a price buffer to accommodate for technological advancements, laws and regulations, consumer demand, and company performance.
This is my speculation for this coming Wednesday.
Tim Cook on Twitter:
Get ready to meet the newest member of the family.
Wednesday, February 19. #AppleLaunch
I’ve been thinking about this (probably too much,) but I don’t think it will be a new iPhone SE.
As a matter of fact, I think the SE lineup will be killed off.
What we will probably get is a new variant of the iPhone 16, rumored to be the iPhone 16E. This makes perfect sense for several reasons.
The iPhone SE lineup has defining features that make it an SE, the biggest two being the classic top and bottom bezels and the Home Button. If you get rid of both of those, you might as well get rid of the name too since it won’t make sense. People have associated the SE branding with those two hallmark features.
I know what you’re thinking. Apple has transformed many other devices and kept the same name, but in this case, pricing is a huge factor.
The 16E will have to support Apple Intelligence since Apple is heavily pushing it, meaning it will have an A17 Pro or A18 chip. Putting a faster chip in an iPhone SE model that beats the iPhone 15 in performance, and pricing it lower than that is nonsensical. If this device is part of the 16 lineup as the 16E, it becomes easy to make the price higher than the SE, but lower than the regular 16. I think it will take the place of the iPhone 15 and start at $699.
So now you have the following price points:
iPhone 16 Pro Max - $1,199 (starts at 256GB)
iPhone 16 Pro - $999
iPhone 16 Plus - $899
iPhone 16 - $799
iPhone 16E - $699
iPhone 15 Plus - $699
iPhone 15 - $599
The iPhone 14 and SE will be discontinued like in the EU, and the starting iPhone price takes a huge jump up from $429 to $599. I don’t think that’s a real shocker even though the click-bait headlines will definitely scream, “Apple raises lowest iPhone price by 40%.”
Seriously though, who really is buying the iPhone SE these days? I’m sure most people are being upsold into the iPhone 14 which is leagues better than the SE, making the real starting price of an iPhone as of today, $599.
Tim’s headline, “newest member of the family,” sounds like a whole new branding, and I think the “E” lineup of iPhones will fall in-line with the “A” line of Pixel phones.
The “E” lineup of iPhones also doesn’t have to be refreshed every year. It will be like the SE, acting like a price buffer to accommodate for technological advancements, laws and regulations, consumer demand, and company performance.
This is my speculation for this coming Wednesday.
JD Vance gets told to take off his Apple Watch.
An open letter from Watches of Espionage, letting JD Vance know of the obvious security risks for a Vice President to be wearing a smartwatch.
Not a politically charged piece, just one that makes sense.
An open letter from Watches of Espionage, letting JD Vance know of the obvious security risks for a Vice President to be wearing a smartwatch.
Not a politically charged piece, just one that makes sense.
Using a Series 3 Ceramic Edition Apple Watch is like driving a weekend car.
It’s like an old, weekend car you want to enjoy for a few days, but then you’re glad it’s over by Sunday afternoon because the car is nice and fun, but also a bit cumbersome, makes a few rattles, is missing many creature comforts, needs to be warmed up before you throw it around, and takes premium gas. 📓
I use my White Ceramic Series 3 occasionally, and it is a joy to look at that thing. Sure it’s an old Apple Watch, but it has that pearlescent white finish that just contrasts well with the black screen and colorful watch faces.
It is the most “Apple-like” color.
Band compatibility is also great with a white watch. Most color combos would work in my opinion, except for the Natural and Gold Stainless Steel, and Natural Titanium bands. Black Steel and Black Titanium would look amazing.
There’s a lot of work involved though in getting this watch up to speed even for just the weekend. I mentioned earlier that it takes about 9 minutes to boot and have the watch connect to my device, but in reality, it takes about 20-30 minutes for the watch to sync all the messages, weather information, email, etc., to my watch from the past week of living.
I was quite surprised last Saturday when I wore it, and my Messages counter on the watch went from “No new messages,” to 40 new messages, down to 22, and then eventually to “No new messages.”
It really is a device you need to be patient with unless you use it every day.
It’s like an old, weekend car you want to enjoy for a few days, but then you’re glad it’s over by Sunday afternoon because the car is nice and fun, but also a bit cumbersome, makes a few rattles, is missing many creature comforts, needs to be warmed up before you throw it around, and takes premium gas.
Apple found a good balance with this watch by stopping the updates at watchOS 8. I know people like to complain that new updates have slowed down their Apple devices and that’s probably true for the Series 3 on watchOS 8, but you can never please anyone, and you have to find that perfect balance where you can update a device with more features, while keeping it as zippy as possible.
If I wear the Series 3 for weeks on end (which I did earlier), then it doesn’t have to do a massive sync of all the data, and it runs just fine. Just don’t let it run out of battery for the love of God.
Once again, it is absolutely illogical to buy a Ceramic Edition Series 3 for productivity reasons. You’re buying this watch for nostalgia and aesthetics, and you’re trying to experience luxury at a discount. You can do the same with the Stainless Steel models, which were beautiful.
I’ll use Adam Savage’s analogy (also fitting for my line of work), and say that the Series 3 Ceramic and Stainless Steel models are like a gateway drug into experiencing Apple’s premium watches at a steep discount.
Why your AirPods might not be working.
If you have AirPods 2, 3, or 4, you might have an issue where the sound is too low, or the sound is heard from the outside vent projecting outward instead of inward to your ears.
I recently had a relative have this problem with her AirPods 2nd gen and 3rd gen, and it was due to earwax build up.
The buildup causes the speaker facing your ear canal to be blocked, causing the sound to be diverted to the outside vent in some cases.
If you have changed nothing else in your Bluetooth or Sound settings, this is probably what’s going on.
It can be hard to see any buildup since the speaker grill is black, but you should follow Apple’s instructions for cleaning them.
You’ll be surprised by how much gunk gets stuck in there.
If you want to avoid this problem in the future, consider getting the AirPods Pro 2. The silicone tips have a mesh grille that detaches from the black speaker head. The mesh is small enough to let sound through, but no earwax can go back into the speaker grille, preventing buildup.
I’ve had my original AirPods Pro for 5 years now, and never had the earwax buildup issue.
If you have AirPods 2, 3, or 4, you might have an issue where the sound is too low, or the sound is heard from the outside vent projecting outward instead of inward to your ears.
I recently had a relative have this problem with her AirPods 2nd gen and 3rd gen, and it was due to earwax build up.
The buildup causes the speaker facing your ear canal to be blocked, causing the sound to be diverted to the outside vent in some cases.
If you have changed nothing else in your Bluetooth or Sound settings, this is probably what’s going on.
It can be hard to see any buildup since the speaker grill is black, but you should follow Apple’s instructions for cleaning them.
You’ll be surprised by how much gunk gets stuck in there.
If you want to avoid this problem in the future, consider getting the AirPods Pro 2. The silicone tips have a mesh grille that detaches from the black speaker head. The mesh is small enough to let sound through, but no earwax can go back into the speaker grille, preventing buildup.
I’ve had my original AirPods Pro for 5 years now, and never had the earwax buildup issue.
Apple Watch Meridian Face - Unique colors you didn’t know about.
I’ve written two earlier pieces about the unique colors for the California and Chronograph Pro watch faces, but what really surprised me was the Meridian watch face. 📓
I’ve written two earlier pieces about the unique colors for the California and Chronograph Pro watch faces, but what really surprised me was the Meridian watch face.
Meridian is another analog watch face like California and Chronograph Pro and is the simplest of the bunch. It just has 4 complications in the middle of the watch in a diamond-shaped pattern.
The dial can be either black or white contrasted with white or black hour markers. The color that you choose only changes the color of the complications.
There are 139 custom colors to choose from, but only four of those give you a unique look that also change the color of the hour and seconds markers. Combine that with either a white or black face, and you have 8 unique watch faces.
And they look amazing.
Those four colors are Clover, Starlight, Red, and Abyss Blue, and they’re located under the Fall 2021 collection.
Whether you use the white or black face, you get an interesting look that you probably didn’t know existed among the other 135 custom colors.
Just for scale, take a look at all the custom colors below, with the four unique colors highlighted:
Now, let’s go dark:
Once again, among all the standard and custom colors, only these four give you that extra splash of color.
My theory for why these four colors are special? In Fall 2021, the Series 7 aluminum models came in four special colors: Green, Starlight, (PRODUCT) RED, and Blue.
They also came in the standard Space Gray which was called Midnight, but no one cares.
There are many shades of red to choose from, but the red from Fall 2021 definitely resembles (PRODUCT) RED. I think Apple wanted matching watch face colors with the debut of these new colors and the newly remodeled edge-to-edge screen on the Series 7.
Whatever the reason, I hope you enjoy these new colors on your Meridian watch face.
How to add the Apple logo to your Apple watch face.
Just like all watch brands that showcase their logo right below the 12 o’clock marker, you can brand your Apple Watch with a Monogram on several watch faces. 📓
Update 2/10/25 @ 8:14pm: added additional image for instructional clarity.
Just like all watch brands that showcase their logo right below the 12 o’clock marker, you can brand your Apple Watch with a Monogram on several watch faces.
Per Apple’s statement:
Choose up to five characters to appear in the Monogram complication on the Typograph, Infograph, Meridian, California, and Color watch faces.
You could add any five characters, but I find it best suited to put the Apple logo in the Monogram complication.
Also, Apple’s statement is wrong. You can also apply the Monogram to the Contour and Solar Analog watch faces (image below).
Go to your Watch App under Clock > Monogram and simply copy and paste this Apple logo:
Then go to one of the compatible watch faces, and for the “Sub-dial Top” complication, go to Personalization and add the Monogram.
You can have your Apple Watch faces looking like this:
WatchOS 11 gets more well deserved criticism.
First it was Zac from 9to5Mac, and now John from Daring Fireball sharing my pain with their Apple Watch frustrations.
Here’s John’s Apple Watch Report Card:
APPLE WATCH: C (LAST YEAR: B)
Series 10 watches feature a new display that supports once-per-second updates while in energy-saving always-on mode. So the seconds hand on an analog face can “tick” once per second even when the display isn’t fully on. But Apple only enabled this ticking seconds indicator on two watch faces, both new to WatchOS 11: Flux and Reflections. Setting aside the fact that I personally don’t like either of those faces (Flux in particular seems deliberately obtuse), this is ridiculous. WatchOS 11 offers, by my quick count, at least 33 different watch faces that offer a non-digital seconds hand or indicator. And only 2 of them support the new 1Hz refresh rate? That’s bullshit. And it wasn’t just a launch thing, because here we are in February, with WatchOS 11.3, and zero additional watch faces have been updated to support it. This is not how a serious watchmaker treats its watches. I will admit to caring far more about always-on seconds hands than most people, but this isn’t how a serious watchmaker deals with technical breakthroughs like this new display with a 1Hz refresh rate. Not just most, but every single watch face should have been updated to support ticking seconds. Apple Watch is turning more into a fitness tracker that happens to show the time, and away from serving as a proper watch.
Also: no Ultra 3 this year. The year-old Ultra 2 did gain a very nice black titanium color option, but that’s it. Kind of weird for a watch that starts at $800 — and that seems quite popular — to skip a year of silicon improvements.
I really hope watchOS 12 fixes all previous watch faces and complications that are compatible with the 1Hz refresh rate, if not sooner.
As for the Ultra 2, marketing wise they get an A for selling the same watch at the same price with a worse color that everyone seems to love even though it rubs off worse than Jet Black.
First it was Zac from 9to5Mac, and now John from Daring Fireball sharing my pain with their Apple Watch frustrations.
Here’s John’s Apple Watch Report Card:
APPLE WATCH: C (LAST YEAR: B)
Series 10 watches feature a new display that supports once-per-second updates while in energy-saving always-on mode. So the seconds hand on an analog face can “tick” once per second even when the display isn’t fully on. But Apple only enabled this ticking seconds indicator on two watch faces, both new to WatchOS 11: Flux and Reflections. Setting aside the fact that I personally don’t like either of those faces (Flux in particular seems deliberately obtuse), this is ridiculous. WatchOS 11 offers, by my quick count, at least 33 different watch faces that offer a non-digital seconds hand or indicator. And only 2 of them support the new 1Hz refresh rate? That’s bullshit. And it wasn’t just a launch thing, because here we are in February, with WatchOS 11.3, and zero additional watch faces have been updated to support it. This is not how a serious watchmaker treats its watches. I will admit to caring far more about always-on seconds hands than most people, but this isn’t how a serious watchmaker deals with technical breakthroughs like this new display with a 1Hz refresh rate. Not just most, but every single watch face should have been updated to support ticking seconds. Apple Watch is turning more into a fitness tracker that happens to show the time, and away from serving as a proper watch.
Also: no Ultra 3 this year. The year-old Ultra 2 did gain a very nice black titanium color option, but that’s it. Kind of weird for a watch that starts at $800 — and that seems quite popular — to skip a year of silicon improvements.
I really hope watchOS 12 fixes all previous watch faces and complications that are compatible with the 1Hz refresh rate, if not sooner.
As for the Ultra 2, marketing wise they get an A for selling the same watch at the same price with a worse color that everyone seems to love even though it rubs off worse than Jet Black.
Adam Savage reviews the AirPods Pro 2 as a hearing aid.
A nice review by Adam Savage, former MythBuster. Calling it a review is doing it injustice as he really goes into his personal life and how hearing aids in general have even changed his marriage dynamics. Didn’t know he wore hearing aids, but his enthusiasm for Apple products and his real world experience really shows how useful the AirPods Pro 2 are.
Some highlights:
I think Apple turning the AirPod Pros into a substitute hearing aid is one of the best sub-features I've seen out of this consumer product in a long time. Having been a very public hearing aid wearer for 15 years, I have been sent a lot of people’s versions of earbud-hearing-aids and I’ll, I’m not naming any names but everything I have tried sucked. Everything I have tried had a very bad user experience in the calibration, in the testing, in the integration. These (the AirPods Pro 2) were really really just as advertised by Apple, straightforward, simple to understand, fast to execute, and awesome to use…
If you have people in your life who need hearing aids, this might be a great gateway drug to hearing aids, given that it is a lot less expensive and it carries a lot less of the, stigma of hearing aids. One of the rhetorical flourishes I gave people a few years ago that a lot of folks have told me worked on people in their lives, is to explain that no one who ever got hearing aids thought to themselves, “well that was a bad idea.”
A nice review by Adam Savage, former MythBuster. Calling it a review is doing it injustice as he really goes into his personal life and how hearing aids in general have even changed his marriage dynamics. Didn’t know he wore hearing aids, but his enthusiasm for Apple products and his real world experience really shows how useful the AirPods Pro 2 are.
Some highlights:
I think Apple turning the AirPod Pros into a substitute hearing aid is one of the best sub-features I've seen out of this consumer product in a long time. Having been a very public hearing aid wearer for 15 years, I have been sent a lot of people’s versions of earbud-hearing-aids and I’ll, I’m not naming any names but everything I have tried sucked. Everything I have tried had a very bad user experience in the calibration, in the testing, in the integration. These (the AirPods Pro 2) were really really just as advertised by Apple, straightforward, simple to understand, fast to execute, and awesome to use…
If you have people in your life who need hearing aids, this might be a great gateway drug to hearing aids, given that it is a lot less expensive and it carries a lot less of the, stigma of hearing aids. One of the rhetorical flourishes I gave people a few years ago that a lot of folks have told me worked on people in their lives, is to explain that no one who ever got hearing aids thought to themselves, “well that was a bad idea.”
Is the Series 3 Apple Watch still usable in 2025?
I’ve been using the Series 3 Apple Watch for about three weeks now. Actually, I’ve been using three different Series 3 watches, and it’s quite interesting how even after 7 generations, the Series 3 still holds up. 📓
I’ve been using the Series 3 Apple Watch for about three weeks now. Actually, I’ve been using three different Series 3 watches, and it’s quite interesting how even after 7 generations, the Series 3 still holds up.
But it definitely is not perfect.
The Series 3 came out back in September 2017 and is still supported by Apple when it comes to hardware repairs. Software wise, the last update it supported was watchOS 8.8.1.
The best way to talk about the Series 3 is to go all out and compare it with the Series 10 to give you a fair comparison between old and new technology.
Initial boot up
This is probably the one thing that really lets you know this is a 7 year old watch.
I did a boot test to see what was the difference in speed, but I discovered a better test, which was to see how quickly it can ping my iPhone after bootup. This way it tests how quickly the watch connects to my iPhone, which is its lifesource.
From initial boot to pinging my Apple Watch, the Series 10 was able to do it in 1 minute.
The Series 3 took 8 minutes and 50 seconds.
I know this is not a good start, but I promise it gets better.
Size comparison
I obtained 3 different models, all at the larger 42mm size. This is the size to get, since the screen is still the original square shape that was not edge to edge. The 38mm is just too small for visibility. The funny thing is, the larger Series 3 body at 42mm is the same size as the smaller Series 10 at 42mm. What was once the bigger Apple Watch is now the size of the smaller watch.
Go big or go home.
When you look at Watch faces that are mainly black and hide the bezels, the difference between these 42mm models isn’t really that big, making the Series 3 still very legible and modern. The only time you notice the smaller screen is when you have a watch face that shows the whole screen, such as Timelapse or Photos. The Series 3 does not have any other full screen watch faces, rightfully so.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ce7da/ce7da2cc49a0b82aad7cdfd170596323c3e54a00" alt="Series 3 Activity analog face - Fahadx.jpeg"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/77d42/77d4217279d0077d128d359288a886d56e98a04c" alt="Series 3 Activity Digital face - Fahadx.jpeg"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0c345/0c345dda418b365e5e58d7e5c23d05eef30270bc" alt="Series 3 Fire face - Fahadx.jpeg"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bb151/bb15154ca94fe7ad1042c7f85856934e3d9c4fde" alt="Series 3 simple face - Fahadx.jpeg"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/86e9c/86e9c2320fb5456845f84ae8a0a4fbb0446087cf" alt="Series 3 solar graph face - Fahadx.jpeg"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/709d6/709d604a54c82cca4d829c1f91686a68124cb05e" alt="Series 3 Timelapse face - Fahadx.jpeg"
Band compatibility
Even though both watches are 42mm, they don’t support the same watch bands. A new 42mm band is smaller than the old 42mm band. It sounds confusing since the number is the same, but this is the one time the math doesn’t add up. There is a good infographic from an eBay store that shows which bands are compatible, or you can read my nitty gritty about band compatibility.
Even though the Series 3 and Series 10 have the same length and width, the Series 3 is 1.7mm thicker than the Series 10. That thickness might change what hole you use to fasten your band, and can even affect compatibility with the Solo and Braided Solo Loop that come in fixed sizes. I haven’t tested the Solo and Braided Solo Loops on my Series 3, but here is what Apple says when you click on compatibility details:
The Solo Loop and Braided Solo Loop bands are only compatible with Apple Watch SE, Apple Watch Series 4 or later, and Apple Watch Ultra or later.
Hardware differences
The basic recipe is still here between the Series 3 and Series 10. The Series 3 has the same Side Button and Digital Crown, but you don’t have any haptics when you rotate the Digital Crown. The Side Button is protruding instead of being flush like the Series 10. As a matter of fact, the Series 3 was the last watch to have the protruding Side Button.
The square shape of the Series 3 is more obvious and Apple has addressed the squareness by chipping away at the corners over the years, making it rounder than it has ever been on the Series 10. I can see why Apple initially got a lot of criticism for releasing a square shaped watch when all the watch faces were round.
Even though the shape has changed over the last 7 years, there is no denying that it is still an Apple Watch at first glance.
Within the Series 3 itself, there are some differences when it comes to hardware, mainly the screen and how it rests on the body. The Series 3 was the second time Apple released a Ceramic Edition model, coming in both White and Gray Ceramic. It is the only Apple Watch that came in Gray Ceramic, which tells me it probably didn’t sell well and why I was able to get one on eBay for $105.
The Ceramic models have a distinct lip or “shelf” between the display and the body, resulting in a break in the fluid feeling when you slide your finger off the screen and onto the body. This was a limitation of the Ceramic manufacturing process because even the entry-level aluminum and mid-tier stainless steel models had the seamless feel and look between screen and body. As beautiful as the Ceramic Edition is, it’s a shame they couldn’t make it as seamless considering the original $1,299 price tag.
Battery
The main issue with the Series 3 would probably be battery life since after 7 years, the battery might be shot. I acquired 3 watches, and their respective battery health was 95%, 99%, and 77%. Ironically the one with 77% looked like it was replaced since it had some residual glue on the Gray Ceramic bezel, while the other two show no signs of battery replacement. I know my White Ceramic model does have an original battery, but I’ll explain how later.
Either way, the battery life is great. Since the Series 3 does not have an Always-On Display, it still manages to get its 18 hour battery life, and even more. Even my Gray Ceramic one that has 77% Battery Health went from 94% to 17% in 23 hours, with a 4-hour period where I didn’t wear the watch. The watch then went to 10% within the next 10 minutes reflecting the bad battery health. I wouldn’t trust the battery life under 20% for a battery this old, but you can still get 18 hours out of it.
There is no low power mode, so you don’t get the benefit of increasing your battery life up to 36 hours.
Performance
Although the watch does lag at times, it is more than bearable because at the end of the day, it is a watch, not your main computing device. You’re not going to edit video or compile code on these. When responding to messages, checking the weather, or setting alarms, everything is slower than a Series 9 or Series 10, but it gets the job done in reasonable time. After a few hours, you even forget about how “slow” it is since you get used to it.
In some ways, the software is actually smoother, which is one of the reasons why I got this watch. When you swipe to switch watch faces, you don’t have to wait for the time to adjust like you do on the latest Apple watches. The time is always what it is instead of the hour and minute hands having to swoop into place. Your complications are always up to date, which also makes the experience more Apple-like. This is due to the simpler interface of watchOS 8 vs the huge overhaul watchOS went through starting with watchOS 10. The older, more simpler software keeps the 7 year old Series 3 nimble enough. With watchOS 10, swiping the watch faces became more stuttery and buggy, and dare I say, more Android-like.
Most 3rd party apps that I use are simple apps that don’t require much processing power. They run in the background as complications. If you use any heavy apps that require a lot of processing power, it probably won’t run well (if at all) on the Series 3.
Still Feature Rich
It might not have all the bells and whistles of the Series 10, but you still get the following benefits:
High and low heart rate notifications
Irregular rhythm notifications
Low cardio fitness notifications
Sleep tracking
Cycle Tracking
Noise Monitoring
Ping your iPhone
Ping your watch with your iPhone
Water resistance (tested and still intact after 7 years(!), but YMMV)
LTE
Features that are absent:
HomeKit compatibility (the new Matter Standard probably broke this.)
Fall detection
Always On Display
Can’t assign watch faces to focus modes
Fast charging
Digital Crown haptics
Emergency SOS
Vitals App
Quirks
There are ways around some of the limitations of the Series 3. For the always-on display, you can still rotate the digital crown to slowly wake up the display to glance at the time (also available on current watches). You also don’t have to worry about whether your display is “always on” vs actually on, because it is either ON or OFF. No confusion there.
You also get the original modular watch face, which was updated in future revision of watchOS. The original modular watch face was unique in letting you change the color of the digital clock with your color choice, whereas the new modular only gives you black and white options for time, depending on the color you choose.
Your watch faces are limited compared to the Series 10 which has many more full screen options, but you do get the following discontinued watch faces on the Series 3:
Of these 4 options, the Explorer watch face is my favorite, giving you red watch hands as an option. It’s also Jony Ive’s favorite watch face.
Source: Hodinkee
An important quirk of the Series 3? It lets you know immediately when your iPhone is out of range with a crossed-out, red iPhone on your screen, so you don’t ever get too far from your iPhone.
Why did I buy 3 of them?
I didn’t mean to buy three of these, it just happened.
I bought a cheap Rose Gold option as a testing device that had 95% battery health, but once I realized how useful the Series 3 is, I decided to go premium and get both Ceramic editions on eBay.
The Ceramic does add a lot of class, and I was fortunate to get the exclusive ceramic Sport Bands bundled with the watch that included a ceramic pin instead of a stainless steel pin.
I could have skipped on the Gray Ceramic as the White Ceramic is definitely more beautiful, but at the cheap price that I got it for, it’s worth holding onto. It really shines in the light versus dark environments.
These watches are old, and you can find great deals on them. The Rose Gold 42mm was $65 with 95% battery health. The Gray Ceramic was $105 with 77% battery health, but if I send it to Apple to get it replaced for $79, I’m looking at around $200 all-in for a fully healthy watch that once retailed for $1349.
Lastly, I found a unicorn Series 3, 42mm White Ceramic that was barely used by the original owner, and it included the box with all the accessories for around $350. It had 99% battery health, and the band that was “used” was barely used.
Who should buy the Series 3?
If you just need a reliable Apple Watch and want the best bang for your buck, don’t buy the Series 3. You can easily get a much better experience and an always-on display for around the same price with a Series 5, especially if you are not concerned about buying a flawless watch. Just make sure to check the battery health before purchasing.
If you’re someone who appreciates Apple and are an Apple enthusiast, it would be worth buying a nice Series 3 watch since you get the best version of the original design. The original Apple Watch (known in the tech circle as the Series 0), Series 2, and Series 3 shared the same industrial design before it was changed for the Series 4.
Owning a Series 3 will be owning a piece of Apple history that is still usable today. You can get premium models for a great price on eBay, and since Apple still supports the Series 3, you can easily get screens and batteries replaced.
Jet Black Apple Watch durability after hitting the floor…hard.
Welp…it happened. 📓
Welp…it happened.
I have been babying my Jet Black Apple Watch after my initial troubles that I had with it.
This time it was my fault.
It was just sitting there, with its beautiful shiny piano black contrasting with the brushed sheen of the Space Black link bracelet. I grabbed it to put it on, and down it fell on the tiled floor.
It all happened so fast.
No bouncing around either, just a hard thud due to the weight of the link bracelet pulling it down.
I grabbed it and didn’t see any obvious signs of damage on the front body or the screen, but there is a blemish at the point of impact near the rear of the bottom right corner.
The body of the watch did not dent, and if I feel and rub my fingers on the point of impact, I can’t feel any roughness. The Digital Crown also feels the same and presses and spins just fine.
Aluminum is more prone to bending than Stainless Steel and Titanium, but since the watch is rounded off, it is less likely to dent since it “slips” on impact. I remember dropping my iPhone 12 mini back when I had it, and the dent was visible and feelable since it was a squared off device.
This impact might be for the best because now, I don’t have to baby it anymore. It’s like that vintage car you want that has 5 miles on it, and you don’t want to mess it up by driving it. This scratch just added 100,000 miles to my watch, so now I can daily it worry free.
I’m just glad it’s not on the front of the watch where it would be staring at me all the time.
Apple’s Watch faces are broken.
Zac Hall from 9to5Mac rants about the Always-On Display with ticking seconds hand on the Series 10:
It’s the only model that displays seconds on the watch face in always-on mode. There’s just one catch: only three watch faces support this hardware feature. Now, that number has grown — to a whopping four.
Zac’s a lot more kind that I am about this lack of consistency in hardware support, but I’m glad someone else is talking about this. I hope he’s wrong (so does he) about Apple’s strategy moving forward with the watch face support:
The good news is that Apple’s new Unity Rhythm face in watchOS 11.3 supports always-on seconds, just like Reflections.
The bad news? This sums up Apple’s watch face game plan: introduce a few new watch faces annually that feature always-on seconds, while simultaneously removing some less popular watch faces that lack this feature.
Ideally, this is incorrect, and watchOS 12 updates all watch faces to support always-on seconds. A standard analog watch face with numerals, like Utility or California, should support always-on seconds — especially if Apple isn’t going to update each face. Every watch face should support the hardware’s capabilities though.
To complicate things further (pun intended), there are a lot of Time based complications that also would benefit from the Always-On Display with ticking seconds hand, but I can live without those for now.
Zac Hall from 9to5Mac rants about the Always-On Display with ticking seconds hand on the Series 10:
It’s the only model that displays seconds on the watch face in always-on mode. There’s just one catch: only three watch faces support this hardware feature. Now, that number has grown — to a whopping four.
Zac’s a lot more kind that I am about this lack of consistency in hardware support, but I’m glad someone else is talking about this. I hope he’s wrong (so does he) about Apple’s strategy moving forward with the watch face support:
The good news is that Apple’s new Unity Rhythm face in watchOS 11.3 supports always-on seconds, just like Reflections.
The bad news? This sums up Apple’s watch face game plan: introduce a few new watch faces annually that feature always-on seconds, while simultaneously removing some less popular watch faces that lack this feature.
Ideally, this is incorrect, and watchOS 12 updates all watch faces to support always-on seconds. A standard analog watch face with numerals, like Utility or California, should support always-on seconds — especially if Apple isn’t going to update each face. Every watch face should support the hardware’s capabilities though.
To complicate things further (pun intended), there are a lot of Time based complications that also would benefit from the Always-On Display with ticking seconds hand, but I can live without those for now.
Apple Watch Chronograph Pro Face - Unique colors you didn’t know about
If you really enjoy the 12 default multi-color watch faces Apple gives you, now you have 4 more to enjoy.
If Craig Federighi thinks this watch face is cool, it’s cool. 📓
Update 2/6/25 @ 5:59PM - this article also applies to the Count Up Watch Face.
Since the beginning of Apple Watch, Apple releases new colors for Apple Watch face customization during different seasons.
Out of the 130+ custom colors to choose from, there are only 4 colors that standout to give you a unique and more professional watch face experience.
Let’s look at the Chronograph Pro watch face.
By default, this watch face gives you 19 dark watch faces that show a single color. The dark watch faces are neat, but they are very one-dimensional with a single color dominating the complications, the main dial, and the sub-dial hands.
Following the 19 dark watch faces, you are greeted with 12 professional looking multi-color watch faces.
There are 140 custom color watch faces you can add, but only 4 of them have that professional multi-color look.
Take a look for yourself:
It’s not as obvious as the California Watch face, but you can see it.
These four bonus colors are: Clover, Starlight, Red, and Abyss Blue.
You can find them under the Fall 2021 season.
English Lavender and Dark Cherry are also in the Fall 2021 Season, but they don’t get the special treatment.
Not sure if this was meant to be, but I’m all for the multi-color effect. You get a more professional looking watch face with more contrast similar to the 12 watch faces Apple gives you by default. All the corner widgets are gray, and you get orange sub-dial hands on white or black sub-dials. That orange sub-dial hand color? Very close if not the same as the iPhone Mute Switch.
These four colors are distinct from their closest resembling professional watch faces and have their own unique look:
My theory for why these four colors are special? In Fall 2021, the Series 7 aluminum models came in four special colors: Green, Starlight, (PRODUCT) RED, and Blue.
They also came in the standard Space Gray which was called Midnight, but no one cares.
There are many shades of red to choose from, but the red from Fall 2021 definitely resembles (PRODUCT) RED. I think Apple wanted matching watch face colors with the debut of these new colors and the newly remodeled edge-to-edge screen on the Series 7.
If you really enjoy the 12 default multi-color watch faces Apple gives you, now you have 4 more to enjoy. If Craig Federighi thinks this watch face is cool, it’s cool.
Apple Watch California Face - Unique colors you didn’t know about
Since the beginning of Apple Watch, Apple releases new colors for Apple Watch face customization during different seasons.
Out of the 130+ custom colors to choose from, there are only 4 colors that standout to give you a unique and more professional watch face experience…📓
Update 2/4/25 @ 6:47PM - this article also applies to the Typograph Watch Face.
Since the beginning of Apple Watch, Apple releases new colors for Apple Watch face customization during different seasons.
Out of the 130+ custom colors to choose from, there are only 4 colors that standout to give you a unique and more professional watch face experience.
Let’s look at the California watch face.
This watch face gives you 21 black watch faces…
followed by 14 full-screen color watch faces.
If you add every custom color as an option, you get over 130 extra black watch faces to choose from, but only 4 of them give you a full-screen color effect.
Take a look for yourself:
These four colors are: Clover, Starlight, Red, and Abyss Blue.
These colors are located under the Fall 2021 season.
English Lavender and Dark Cherry are also in the Fall 2021 Season, but they don’t get the special treatment.
Not sure if this was meant to be, but I’m all for the full screen effect. These four colors seem to be coded in watchOS like the 14 default full-screen colors even though they’re custom colors.
These four colors are distinct from their closest resembling default watch faces and have their own unique look:
The only reason why I think these 4 colors are special is because besides Midnight (which is just fancy for Space Gray, a default color since the Apple Watch’s inception), the Series 7 aluminum models came in Green, Starlight, (PRODUCT) RED, and Blue. There are many shades of red to choose from, but the red from Fall 2021 resembles (PRODUCT) RED. I think Apple wanted matching watch face colors with the debut of these new colors and the newly remodeled edge-to-edge screen on the Series 7.
Most of the 130+ optional colors are tiny hexadecimal variations from the standard colors, but these 4 colors legitimately give you a fresh look at the California watch face.
The Vision Pro’s future lies in healthcare.
Wesley Hilliard from AppleInsider:
Sharp HealthCare purchased 30 Apple Vision Pros and started a Spatial Computing Center of Excellence in February 2024. One year later, they are hosting a summit to share what doctors have learned about using the headset in healthcare.
The Sharp HealthCare summit enables 300 doctors from 10 countries around the world to share how they've implemented Apple Vision Pro in their workflows. Adoption by doctors has been quite surprising, as enterprise, especially the medical field, tend to be quite slow at bringing new technologies into their work.
The Vision Pro has three main problems for mass-market appeal:
Cost
Comfort
Portability
For healthcare, the Vision Pro actually solves these problems:
As for the $3,500 price, the doctors say it pales in comparison to the $20,000 monitors used in the operating room. And the price coming down will only help drive adoption.
Comfort and portability are also huge benefits according to a surgeon interviewed by Fast Company:
“We were looking around the operating room,” he remembers. “We have a lot of monitors, a lot of clutter. We were like, ‘There’s got to be a better way to do this.’”
It wasn’t just about tidiness. ”For [a] monitor to be in the ideal position for surgery, it really should just be directly in front of your head without having to turn your neck or adjust your body,” explains Dr. Broderick. “But often in laparoscopy, you have to adjust your body, turn your neck, and be in uncomfortable positions. And with repeated use like that, it can lead to tight muscles, neck injury, back injury.”
The doctors’ frustration with this situation happened to come to a boil at an opportune time. On February 2, Apple released the Apple Vision Pro, its first headset. A major element of the device’s spatial computing experience was the ability to float multiple virtual screens of any size in real-world surroundings, unconstructed by the bulky inconvenience of physical displays. Dr. Broderick’s team got its hands on a loaner Vision Pro and worked with UCSD Health chief clinical and innovation officer Christopher Broadhurst to assemble a system capable of streaming video feeds and overlaying them on the live view of a surgery in progress, greatly reducing the need to crane necks.
In short order, the idea became a trial that involved real patients and is currently undergoing peer review. “We’ve done over 50 cases and have had great success thus far,” says Dr. Broderick.
Wesley Hilliard from AppleInsider:
Sharp HealthCare purchased 30 Apple Vision Pros and started a Spatial Computing Center of Excellence in February 2024. One year later, they are hosting a summit to share what doctors have learned about using the headset in healthcare.
The Sharp HealthCare summit enables 300 doctors from 10 countries around the world to share how they've implemented Apple Vision Pro in their workflows. Adoption by doctors has been quite surprising, as enterprise, especially the medical field, tend to be quite slow at bringing new technologies into their work.
The Vision Pro has three main problems for mass-market appeal:
Cost
Comfort
Portability
For healthcare, the Vision Pro actually solves these problems:
As for the $3,500 price, the doctors say it pales in comparison to the $20,000 monitors used in the operating room. And the price coming down will only help drive adoption.
Comfort and portability are also huge benefits according to a surgeon interviewed by Fast Company:
“We were looking around the operating room,” he remembers. “We have a lot of monitors, a lot of clutter. We were like, ‘There’s got to be a better way to do this.’”
It wasn’t just about tidiness. ”For [a] monitor to be in the ideal position for surgery, it really should just be directly in front of your head without having to turn your neck or adjust your body,” explains Dr. Broderick. “But often in laparoscopy, you have to adjust your body, turn your neck, and be in uncomfortable positions. And with repeated use like that, it can lead to tight muscles, neck injury, back injury.”
The doctors’ frustration with this situation happened to come to a boil at an opportune time. On February 2, Apple released the Apple Vision Pro, its first headset. A major element of the device’s spatial computing experience was the ability to float multiple virtual screens of any size in real-world surroundings, unconstructed by the bulky inconvenience of physical displays. Dr. Broderick’s team got its hands on a loaner Vision Pro and worked with UCSD Health chief clinical and innovation officer Christopher Broadhurst to assemble a system capable of streaming video feeds and overlaying them on the live view of a surgery in progress, greatly reducing the need to crane necks.
In short order, the idea became a trial that involved real patients and is currently undergoing peer review. “We’ve done over 50 cases and have had great success thus far,” says Dr. Broderick.
Did Apple fix its Drug Interaction Checker for Pregnancy?
I have tried out Apple's Drug Interaction Checker once again, a year and a half since the last time I looked at it. I had 4 complaints about the Interaction Checker when I first tested it:
Two drugs in the same category that are taken together do not bring any warnings to consult your Healthcare Team, even though they can cause severe problems.
Two of the literal same drugs, with one being the brand and the other being generic, when taken together do not bring any warnings to consult your Healthcare Team, even though taking the same medication twice can cause problems.
The Medications section does not give you warnings if you are pregnant and are taking dangerous medications.
The Medications section does not give you warnings if you are pregnant and drink alcohol, smoke tobacco, or use cannabis.
Has Apple fixed these issues? 📓
I have tried out Apple's Drug Interaction Checker once again, a year and a half since the last time I looked at it. I had 4 complaints about the Interaction Checker when I first tested it:
Two drugs in the same category that are taken together do not bring any warnings to consult your Healthcare Team, even though they can cause severe problems.
Two of the literal same drugs, with one being the brand and the other being generic, when taken together do not bring any warnings to consult your Healthcare Team, even though taking the same medication twice can cause problems.
The Medications section does not give you warnings if you are pregnant and are taking dangerous medications.
The Medications section does not give you warnings if you are pregnant and drink alcohol, smoke tobacco, or use cannabis.
Has Apple fixed these issues?
They have not fixed problems 1 and 2, which you can read about in more detail.
Problem 4 is also not fixed. You do not get any warnings about pregnancy or lactation when you tell the Health app that you’re consuming alcohol, cannabis, or tobacco, even though these are all red flags.
Problem 3 has been fixed. I am glad to say that the Cycle Tracking section, which includes pregnancy, "talks" to the Medications section and gives you the proper warnings about your medications if you are pregnant.
Here was the list of drugs I used to test out the Health App (same as last year):
Crestor (generic name is rosuvastatin) - cholesterol medicine.
Zocor (generic name is simvastatin) - this is the same drug category as above, used for cholesterol medicine.
Simvastatin - literally the same drug as Zocor.
Rifampin - used for treating tuberculosis.
Lisinopril - blood pressure medication.
Accutane - for severe acne.
Chantix - for smoking cessation.
Promethazine VC with Codeine - used to treat cold, stuffiness, and allergy symptoms.
Now when you go to the Medications section in the Health App, you get critical alerts right at the top:
If you scroll to the bottom, you will see a new "Medication Information" section that lists your Drug Interactions, as well as Pregnancy and Lactation warnings.
If we go into the Pregnancy warnings, we get very useful information for each drug that is problematic. There are 4 other alerts mentioned, but are not as critical and don't have the yellow banner.
Lactation warnings also are available, which is great and gives people more time to consult with their Healthcare Team.
None of this information was available last year, so Apple did a great job of integrating medication alerts with a woman’s pregnancy and lactation status.
They still need to fix the other 3 issues I mentioned, and treat alcohol, cannabis, and tobacco as drugs instead of “medication factors,” which is their legal classification.
CVS allows you to use your iPhone to unlock high-value items.
Ryan Christoffel from 9to5Mac:
CVS today announced the launch of a newly rebranded and updated CVS Health app (formerly called CVS Pharmacy). The iPhone app offers a variety of new features, but perhaps the most exciting is one that’s currently being piloted in select CVS stores: the ability to open locked-up product cabinets.
When it comes to retail shopping experiences, CVS can make things especially frustrating.
That’s because, depending on your local store, you may find that CVS locks up the majority of its products.
Historically, this has required hitting a button to call a CVS employee for help. The whole process is a pain for shoppers and a pain for employees.
But soon, the new CVS app could solve that.
I remember this being an issue back in my retail days, but now you won’t have to have that embarrassing conversation with your local CVS employee to, “please unlock the condoms for me.”
Ryan Christoffel from 9to5Mac:
CVS today announced the launch of a newly rebranded and updated CVS Health app (formerly called CVS Pharmacy). The iPhone app offers a variety of new features, but perhaps the most exciting is one that’s currently being piloted in select CVS stores: the ability to open locked-up product cabinets.
When it comes to retail shopping experiences, CVS can make things especially frustrating.
That’s because, depending on your local store, you may find that CVS locks up the majority of its products.
Historically, this has required hitting a button to call a CVS employee for help. The whole process is a pain for shoppers and a pain for employees.
But soon, the new CVS app could solve that.
I remember this being an issue back in my retail days, but now you won’t have to have that embarrassing conversation with your local CVS employee to, “please unlock the condoms for me.”
AirPods with “tiny cameras.”
Joe Rossignol from MacRumors:
Apple continues to explore the idea of releasing camera-equipped AirPods in the future, according to Bloomberg's Mark Gurman.
Gurman only briefly mentioned the possibility of AirPods gaining tiny cameras, as part of his Power On newsletter intro this week, focused on Apple's future wearables ambitions. He did not explain what the cameras would be used for.
The tiny cameras would not be for taking photos, but rather serve as infrared sensors.
Here’s what Ming Chi-Kuo said about these infrared cameras:
Kuo said the new AirPods with infrared cameras would provide an enhanced spatial audio experience with the Apple Vision Pro headset.
"For example, when a user is watching a video with Vision Pro and wearing this new AirPods, if users turn their heads to look in a specific direction, the sound source in that direction can be emphasized to enhance the spatial audio/computing experience," wrote Kuo.
The infrared cameras could potentially enable "in-air gesture control" as well, allowing for device interaction with hand movements.
Although enhanced Spatial Audio might be a feature, I’m sure Apple’s target with this is more health features, such as blood pressure monitoring. I’ve talked about this at length a few days ago, and it only makes sense that these infrared sensors are PPG sensors just like on the Apple Watch for measuring heart rate, oxygen saturation, pulse, etc.
Still a few years to go before it’s ready for prime time.
Joe Rossignol from MacRumors:
Apple continues to explore the idea of releasing camera-equipped AirPods in the future, according to Bloomberg's Mark Gurman.
Gurman only briefly mentioned the possibility of AirPods gaining tiny cameras, as part of his Power On newsletter intro this week, focused on Apple's future wearables ambitions. He did not explain what the cameras would be used for.
The tiny cameras would not be for taking photos, but rather serve as infrared sensors.
Here’s what Ming Chi-Kuo said about these infrared cameras:
Kuo said the new AirPods with infrared cameras would provide an enhanced spatial audio experience with the Apple Vision Pro headset.
"For example, when a user is watching a video with Vision Pro and wearing this new AirPods, if users turn their heads to look in a specific direction, the sound source in that direction can be emphasized to enhance the spatial audio/computing experience," wrote Kuo.
The infrared cameras could potentially enable "in-air gesture control" as well, allowing for device interaction with hand movements.
Although enhanced Spatial Audio might be a feature, I’m sure Apple’s target with this is more health features, such as blood pressure monitoring. I’ve talked about this at length a few days ago, and it only makes sense that these infrared sensors are PPG sensors just like on the Apple Watch for measuring heart rate, oxygen saturation, pulse, etc.
Still a few years to go before it’s ready for prime time.
An Apple Watch, a MacBook, and an iPhone all for less than $300?
Saw Luke Miani’s recent video, and it is a compelling ecosystem for a young adult. I’m talking about a late tween or early teenager, especially if they’re homeschooled and their current laptop is a Chromebook that makes the original MacBook Air screen look like a Retina display.
Yes, it’s that bad.
The fact that a 5 year old watch, a 10 year old laptop, and an almost 3 year old phone can still communicate with each other just seems incredible. It shouldn’t really surprise me since I’ve been using an 11 year old laptop that communicates with the newest iPhone and Apple Watch for logging in and Apple Pay.
Saw Luke Miani’s recent video, and it is a compelling ecosystem for a young adult. I’m talking about a late tween or early teenager, especially if they’re homeschooled and their current laptop is a Chromebook that makes the original MacBook Air screen look like a Retina display.
Yes, it’s that bad.
The fact that a 5 year old watch, a 10 year old laptop, and an almost 3 year old phone can still communicate with each other just seems incredible. It shouldn’t really surprise me since I’ve been using an 11 year old laptop that communicates with the newest iPhone and Apple Watch for logging in and Apple Pay.